Air travel is uncomfortable. That’s a given. But if you’ve ever flown internationally, you know that the degree of discomfort varies significantly between domestic and international flights, even in economy. After 15 years, I think I finally found the root cause.
The relationship between international airlines and their passengers is essentially one of a service provider to a client. Although the price is hefty and your trip probably longer, you get more than just transportation for your airfare. You get treated as a guest, not just as a consumer. The beverages and snacks, and meals if the flight is long enough, you’re served are complimentary, served on trays with silverware and cups not made of Styrofoam. Your flight attendants are usually younger. When working the aisles, their focus is primarily on the passengers, addressing each other only when necessary. As with any professional service provider, international airlines get to set some restrictions on the service they provide. They set behavior guidelines that transcend any one culture or country, and by getting on their aircraft you agree to abide by their rules. They are prepared to enforce them if necessary, but first they will appeal to your decency and courtesy until you show a complete lack thereof. That being said, they’re still more than willing to negotiate their services with clients who need special accommodations or at least to explain why they cannot. In short, in every dealing with an international airline, you are made to feel that the company respects you and your business, that you are their responsibility while in the air and that your responsibility is to be compliant in return, that they take to heart getting you to your destination in as much comfort as you can afford.
Domestic airlines, on the other hand, regard their passengers purely as customers. They know that you have several other options for your domestic air travel needs. They know that they are all easily substitutable and that you have little to no loyalty to any of them to prevent you from hunting down the absolute best deal. Therefore, they don’t waste their time or money trying to make your relatively short flight into a an exceptional experience because you don’t care anyway. All you want is a good price and to get there safely. From the flight crew perspective, the passenger is much like the customer at their retail counter who comes and goes as quick episodes throughout their day, who might try to cheat the system, who may be a pleasant fellow or may be lawsuit waiting to happen. They even try to forewarn the passenger about any role they might have to play in an emergency so that no one can come back in a rainy day and say that they were harmed as a result of their ignorance. That quite clearly puts the passenger on equal footing with the flight crew, at least in the former’s eyes. The lasting impression is that your flight was no more than a means to an end both for you, the passenger, and for the airline, and that the flight attendants are just exulted passengers whose job is to marshal the crowd into safe belt-buckling, electronic-device-avoiding practices.
Almost every visible aspect in the domestic and international travel flight experiences that I can think of can be traced to their respective and fundamentally different relationship styles. I believe this is one of those situations where having too much choice actually lowers the overall standards.
In retrospect, this probably shouldn’t have taken 15 years to figure out.
KRP








